Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 3:23:21 GMT
Usluer, lived together with G. Usuler and F. Polat outside of marriage for a while, therefore the conditions of living a dishonorable life were met and the plaintiff could not be expected to live with him, the rejection of the case with the written justification was not deemed correct. Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil Chamber 09.11.2009, 2009/16450 E., 2009/19112 K. It is understood from the criminal court decision in the file that the defendant was sentenced to fifteen years of imprisonment with the decision numbered 170-5 dated 14.01.
2010 of Aydın 1st High Criminal Court France Telegram Number Data for the crime of intentional murder committed on 05.07.2009. Although the material facts were proven by the defendant's confession and other evidence, the fact that the criminal court decision was not final was not deemed effective on the outcome. The act of intentional murder is "humiliating" and, due to this nature, makes living together unbearable for the plaintiff spouse, and the plaintiff cannot be expected to live with someone who committed this crime. Usluer, lived together with G.
Usuler and F. Polat outside of marriage for a while, therefore thefact that the criminal court decision was not final was not deemed effective on the outcome. The act of intentional murder is "humiliating" and, due to this nature, makes living together unbearable for the plaintiff spouse, and the plaintiff cannot be expected to live with someone who committed this crime.
2010 of Aydın 1st High Criminal Court France Telegram Number Data for the crime of intentional murder committed on 05.07.2009. Although the material facts were proven by the defendant's confession and other evidence, the fact that the criminal court decision was not final was not deemed effective on the outcome. The act of intentional murder is "humiliating" and, due to this nature, makes living together unbearable for the plaintiff spouse, and the plaintiff cannot be expected to live with someone who committed this crime. Usluer, lived together with G.
Usuler and F. Polat outside of marriage for a while, therefore thefact that the criminal court decision was not final was not deemed effective on the outcome. The act of intentional murder is "humiliating" and, due to this nature, makes living together unbearable for the plaintiff spouse, and the plaintiff cannot be expected to live with someone who committed this crime.